- Feedback

[New Thread]

Project Gladden has been released:
https://gitgud.io/threshold862543/gladden

Browsing-only gateways:
https://gladden.peerchan.net/landing/index.html
http://bxvmrzad6nlz6w5tpw6hb7mpjco7qre5dt2p5zej5xjyggbswpaukuid.onion/landing/index.html

Page: [1] | [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]

Anonymous 8/27/2023, 04:13:45 No.1 [Open]

Feel free to post suggestions, comments, bug reports, etc. here.

Alternate solution to the moderation problem Anonymous 11/27/2023, 14:51:56 No.13 [Open]

There is a chat application called Cabal Chat (https://cabal.chat/) that has a feature called "subjective moderation". I don't understand it fully but from what I gather there are separate moderation teams that users can voluntarily subscribe to.
I think it's a good idea for imageboards such as this one. What do you think?
This solves the problem of moderation that is hostile to the userbase (or just a portion of it) since if one moderator/team goes bad, people can just switch.
P2P is also well suited to it as there is no server admin that can override the system.

Anonymous 11/27/2023, 14:52:50 No.14

Oops https://cabal.chat/

Anonymous 11/27/2023, 14:58:14 No.15

It also might be a good a idea to borrow a leaf from Cabal's book and allow specifying an admin key in the URL. That way you can link to the board without directing people to an unmoderated mess.

Anonymous 11/27/2023, 15:01:10 No.16

Now that I think about it, I think NNTPchan had something like this.

Anonymous 12/6/2023, 04:32:57 No.19

Nice, this solution is ideal and where things should end up.
Ultimately we should be thinking about filters rather than "canon moderation actions" as on a traditional server.

Anonymous 2/23/2024, 16:07:17 No.23

20220721_102133.png
[Hide] (658.5KB, 548x555)

I'm actually working on something recently, that instead of being a hybrid system like peerchan currently is, with mediators and validators built in as a hybrid system, will be entirely p2p at first (though posting by proxy through an HTTP interface like you can do here can also be supported). And I'm thinking to give it this subjective moderation system. Where you can delete/filter posts and blacklist certain files on your end, and also subscribe to other deletors as you see fit type of thing. I'll post more about this when it's closer to being ready. Instead of being based on a jschan fork I'tll hopefully be something more lightweight and simpler for people to get started with. I've even heard you can compile node.js code into an executable so people wouldnt have to install node on their systems first, just be a "extract and click to run" type of thing (at first, again browser version considerations can also come later on)

Anonymous 10/16/2023, 01:34:49 No.12 [Open]

Have you heard of IPVM?
Might be useful, idk
https://github.com/ipvm-wg/spec

Anonymous 12/6/2023, 04:31:44 No.18

I have come to the stance that IPFS is a bit overly focused on the concept of having a single monolithic network operating on a standardized framework but having it be distributed. I think this confusion is where they lose their sense of direction.

That's not really necessary in a world of distributed networking. Peers can take part in the systems they want to rather than taking part in a single "global" homogenous system.

Replies: >>20

Anonymous 12/7/2023, 20:05:31 No.20

>>18
Makes me think of this distinction: https://nullchinchilla.me/2023/11/socialist-vs-agorist-protocols/

Anonymous 12/7/2023, 20:41:21 No.21

That being said, I don't see how we can have decentralised moderation a la >>13 if users have to have specific relationships with specific sysadmins (if that's what you mean to suggest).

Anonymous 12/7/2023, 20:43:22 No.22

Did you mean something like FChan?

Anonymous 9/29/2023, 19:57:39 No.10 [Open]

How big a file can the network handle?
Whats the upload limit on this sits?

Anonymous 9/29/2023, 19:58:49 No.11

*site

Anonymous 12/6/2023, 04:27:18 No.17

As files are chunked up into blocks the limit can be quite high.

However the new post file validation system can be set to only allow files of a certain size. I believe it is 16 MB currently.

Anonymous 8/30/2023, 13:06:33 No.6 [Open]

maki u better not shut this down in two weeks ill throw in the bonus of not bulling you for two weeks

Replies: >>7

Anonymous 9/1/2023, 17:37:11 No.7

>>6 (OP) 
Who's maki?

Replies: >>9

Anonymous 9/2/2023, 22:27:37 No.9

>>7
funny post

Anonymous 8/27/2023, 20:57:37 No.2 [Open]

Why does it allow opus files but not m4a?

Anonymous 9/1/2023, 18:48:07 No.8

Vanilla jschan only supports certain types of files. However as P2P file upload is developed I think we'll be able to support arbitrary file types.

Anonymous 8/28/2023, 01:50:21 No.3 [Open]

am i truly anonymous?

Anonymous 8/28/2023, 13:15:06 No.4

As with vanilla jschan, IP addresses are stored on the mediator node's machine, allowing for bans to work. However unlike jschan they're stored in a separate database so that posts can be queried by peers without revealing the identity of the poster.

Anonymous 8/28/2023, 13:17:10 No.5

Also, jschan supports an IP cloaking system where only something akin to a hash of the IP can be stored.

Page: [1] | [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]

/feedback/ - Feedback

Actions:

Captcha: